Add Affinity CRM #499
Add Affinity CRM #499
Conversation
|
Qovery can create a Preview Environment for this PR.
This comment has been generated from Qovery AI 🤖.
|
|
|
@mit-27 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Panora Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce a comprehensive integration with the Affinity CRM system, adding new services, mappers, and data types for managing contacts, deals, companies, notes, and users. This integration enhances the CRM's ability to interact with Affinity's API, allowing for the addition and synchronization of various entities while maintaining backward compatibility with existing functionalities. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Tip OpenAI O1 model for chat
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (8)
Additional comments not posted (24)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (21)
- packages/api/src/@core/utils/types/original/original.crm.ts (11 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/company/company.module.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/types.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/contact/contact.module.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/types.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/deal/deal.module.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/types.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/note/note.module.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/note/services/affinity/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/note/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/note/services/affinity/types.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/user/services/affinity/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/user/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/user/services/affinity/types.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/user/user.module.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (3)
packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/types.ts (1)
Learnt from: developerdhruv PR: panoratech/Panora#481 File: packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/attio/index.ts:32-38 Timestamp: 2024-06-05T06:18:55.940Z Learning: Focus reviews on the `affinity` folder within the CRM services as per user's request.packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/index.ts (1)
Learnt from: developerdhruv PR: panoratech/Panora#481 File: packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/attio/index.ts:32-38 Timestamp: 2024-06-05T06:18:55.940Z Learning: Focus reviews on the `affinity` folder within the CRM services as per user's request.packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/index.ts (1)
Learnt from: developerdhruv PR: panoratech/Panora#481 File: packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/attio/index.ts:32-38 Timestamp: 2024-06-05T06:18:55.940Z Learning: Focus reviews on the `affinity` folder within the CRM services as per user's request.
Biome
packages/api/src/crm/user/services/affinity/index.ts
[error] 22-22: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/mappers.ts
[error] 77-77: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'opts' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
packages/api/src/crm/note/services/affinity/index.ts
[error] 22-22: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/index.ts
[error] 23-23: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/index.ts
[error] 22-22: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/index.ts
[error] 21-21: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
Additional comments not posted (62)
packages/api/src/crm/user/services/affinity/types.ts (4)
1-5: Well-defined User InterfaceThe
AffinityUserinterface is well-defined and encapsulates the user-related data effectively with references toTenant,User, andGrantinterfaces. This structure should facilitate easy mapping and manipulation of user data from Affinity CRM.
7-11: Tenant Interface ReviewThe
Tenantinterface is concise and includes essential fields such asid,name, andsubdomain. This should adequately represent the tenant information in the context of Affinity CRM.
13-18: User Interface ReviewThe
Userinterface includes basic but essential user information fields. It is well-structured for representing individual user details within the system.
20-24: Grant Interface ReviewThe
Grantinterface captures authorization details effectively. The inclusion oftype,scope, andcreatedAtfields are appropriate for managing access control and audit trails.packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/types.ts (4)
1-7: Comprehensive Deal InterfaceThe
AffinityDealinterface is comprehensive and well-structured, covering essential aspects of a deal such as associated persons, organizations, and list entries. This should facilitate effective management and retrieval of deal data.
9-16: ListEntry Interface ReviewThe
ListEntryinterface is detailed and includes necessary fields for tracking the creation and association of list entries within deals. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity and traceability of list operations.
18-23: Deal Input Type ReviewThe
AffinityDealInputtype is well-defined, allowing flexibility with optional fields for person and organization IDs. This design supports various scenarios for deal creation and updates, making it versatile.
25-25: Output Type for DealsThe
AffinityDealOutputtype, being a partial type ofAffinityDeal, is appropriate for operations where not all deal data needs to be returned, such as in search results or partial updates.packages/api/src/crm/note/services/affinity/types.ts (3)
1-18: Detailed Note InterfaceThe
AffinityNoteinterface is exceptionally detailed, covering a wide range of fields that are essential for a comprehensive representation of notes within the CRM system. This should greatly enhance the functionality and usability of the note management system.
20-28: Note Input Type ReviewThe
AffinityNoteInputtype is well-structured, providing flexibility with optional fields for associating notes with persons, organizations, and opportunities. This design is beneficial for creating and updating notes with varying levels of detail.
31-31: Output Type for NotesThe
AffinityNoteOutputtype, being a partial type ofAffinityNote, is suitable for scenarios where partial note data is sufficient. This could include search results or summaries, enhancing performance and reducing data transfer overhead.packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/types.ts (7)
1-12: Well-defined interface for AffinityCompany.The interface
AffinityCompanyis comprehensive and well-structured, covering all necessary fields for representing a company entity in Affinity CRM.
14-20: Clear and concise definition for ListEntry.The interface
ListEntryis well-defined, with clear fields that are essential for tracking list entries within the CRM system.
22-30: Comprehensive date tracking with InteractionDates.The interface
InteractionDateseffectively captures various important dates related to interactions, which is crucial for CRM functionalities.
32-40: Detailed interaction tracking in Interactions interface.The
Interactionsinterface is well-structured, allowing for detailed tracking of various types of interactions, each linked to anInteractionsType.
42-45: Effective structure for InteractionsType.The interface
InteractionsTypeis effectively designed to capture essential details of interactions, focusing on the date and involved person IDs.
47-51: Flexible input type for company data.The type
AffinityCompanyInputis well-designed, offering flexibility with optional fields, which is ideal for creating or updating records in a CRM system.
53-53: Well-suited output type for flexible data retrieval.The type
AffinityCompanyOutput, using TypeScript'sPartial, is appropriately designed for functions that may return a subset of company data.packages/api/src/crm/user/user.module.ts (1)
1-1: Review of module dependencies and structure.The module is well-structured with clear separation of services and mappers, aligning with NestJS best practices. All necessary services and mappers appear to be correctly provided and exported, which should support the integration with Affinity CRM as described in the PR objectives.
packages/api/src/crm/deal/deal.module.ts (1)
1-1: Formatting change noted.The addition of a blank line at the beginning of the file is a minor formatting change and does not impact the functionality of the module.
packages/api/src/crm/user/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1)
10-62: Review of AffinityUserMapper implementation.The
AffinityUserMapperclass is well-implemented with clear separation of unification and de-unification logic. The use of custom field mappings is a robust approach for handling diverse data structures from different CRMs. However, thedesunifymethod at lines 16-24 returnsundefined, which might be intentional but should be confirmed or documented to avoid confusion.Please confirm if the
desunifymethod is intended to returnundefinedor if this is an oversight. Consider adding a return statement or documentation to clarify its behavior.packages/api/src/crm/contact/contact.module.ts (1)
1-1: Approved formatting change.The addition of a blank line at the beginning of the file is a minor change that improves readability and adheres to coding standards.
packages/api/src/crm/company/company.module.ts (1)
50-50: Approved addition ofCloseCompanyMapper.The inclusion of
CloseCompanyMapperin the list of providers enhances the module's functionality by supporting new mapping capabilities. Ensure that the integration of this mapper is thoroughly tested.Run the following script to verify the integration of
CloseCompanyMapper:Verification successful
Integration of
CloseCompanyMapperverified successfully.The
CloseCompanyMapperis correctly imported and included in the list of providers in thecompany.module.tsfile. Its implementation inmappers.tsconfirms that it is properly set up and registered. No issues were found with its integration.
company.module.ts: Import and provider list inclusion.mappers.ts: Class implementation and registration.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `CloseCompanyMapper`. # Test: Search for the usage of `CloseCompanyMapper`. Expect: Proper instantiation and usage in the module. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'CloseCompanyMapper'Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `CloseCompanyMapper`. # Test: Search for the usage of `CloseCompanyMapper` in TypeScript files. rg --glob '*.ts' -A 5 'CloseCompanyMapper'Length of output: 1714
packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/mappers.ts (3)
11-15: Well-structured class registration.The use of
@Injectable()and service registration within the constructor follows best practices for modularity and reusability in NestJS applications.
17-42: Correct implementation of desunify method.The method handles the transformation of unified company data to the Affinity CRM format efficiently, with support for custom field mappings. The use of asynchronous processing is appropriate.
45-61: Efficient handling of multiple company outputs.The method efficiently handles both single and multiple company outputs using
Promise.all, which is appropriate for asynchronous operations. Good separation of concerns by delegating tomapSingleCompanyToUnifiedfor individual transformations.packages/api/src/crm/note/services/affinity/index.ts (3)
13-25: Well-structured class registration.The use of
@Injectable()and service registration within the constructor follows best practices for modularity and reusability in NestJS applications.Tools
Biome
[error] 22-22: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
26-63: Correct implementation of addNote method.The method appropriately handles HTTP requests and errors, using axios for making requests and structured error handling. Logging and structured responses are well implemented for debugging and client interaction.
66-103: Efficient handling of note synchronization.The method efficiently handles the synchronization of notes using axios for HTTP requests. Error handling and logging are well implemented, providing clear feedback and aiding in debugging.
packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/mappers.ts (3)
12-17: Well-structured class registration.The use of
@Injectable()and service registration within the constructor follows best practices for modularity and reusability in NestJS applications.
19-48: Correct implementation of desunify method.The method handles the transformation of unified contact data to the Affinity CRM format efficiently, with support for custom field mappings. The use of asynchronous processing is appropriate.
51-68: Efficient handling of multiple contact outputs.The method efficiently handles both single and multiple contact outputs using
Promise.all, which is appropriate for asynchronous operations. Good separation of concerns by delegating tomapSingleContactToUnifiedfor individual transformations.packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/index.ts (2)
28-69: Review security practices around token handling.The method implementation for adding a company is robust, including error handling and API interaction. However, consider reviewing the security practices around decrypting the token on the fly. Ensure that the decryption process is secure and that decrypted tokens are not logged or exposed in any way.
71-107: Consistent implementation; reiterate security check.The
syncCompaniesmethod is implemented consistently with theaddCompanymethod, which is good for maintainability. As with the previous method, ensure that the security practices around token handling are thoroughly reviewed to prevent any potential exposure of sensitive data.packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/mappers.ts (3)
11-14: Service registration is correctly implemented.The constructor correctly registers the
AffinityDealMapperservice with the mappings registry, ensuring it can be utilized effectively within the application.
16-54: Ensure robust error handling in data mapping.The
desunifymethod effectively handles the conversion of deal data to the Affinity-specific format. However, given the complexity and the number of asynchronous operations, ensure that error handling is robust to gracefully manage potential failures in database calls or remote ID fetches.
56-72: Flexible and robust data mapping; ensure error handling.The
unifymethod is well-implemented, handling both single and multiple deal inputs, which enhances flexibility. Ensure that error handling is robust, especially when dealing with multiple asynchronous operations involved in mapping data.packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/index.ts (2)
27-69: Review security practices around token handling.The method implementation for adding a contact is robust, including error handling and API interaction. However, consider reviewing the security practices around decrypting the token on the fly. Ensure that the decryption process is secure and that decrypted tokens are not logged or exposed in any way.
71-114: Consistent implementation; reiterate security check.The
syncContactsmethod is implemented consistently with theaddContactmethod, which is good for maintainability. As with the previous method, ensure that the security practices around token handling are thoroughly reviewed to prevent any potential exposure of sensitive data.packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/index.ts (2)
25-83: Well-implemented method for adding deals.The
addDealmethod is robust, handling API interactions and errors effectively. The use ofaxiosfor HTTP requests and theEncryptionServicefor decrypting tokens are appropriate and secure practices.
86-126: Effective synchronization method for deals.The
syncDealsmethod is effectively implemented, ensuring that deals are synchronized correctly with Affinity CRM. The error handling and logging are appropriately managed, providing clear feedback on the operation's status.packages/api/src/crm/note/services/affinity/mappers.ts (3)
11-15: Constructor setup is appropriate.The constructor of
AffinityNoteMappercorrectly registers the service and sets up necessary utilities, ensuring that the mapper is ready for use.
17-84: Robust method for converting to Affinity-specific model.The
desunifymethod is well-implemented, effectively handling the conversion of a unified note model to an Affinity-specific model. The handling of custom field mappings and the use of utilities to fetch remote IDs are particularly noteworthy.
87-103: Effective method for unifying notes.The
unifymethod effectively handles the conversion of Affinity-specific note models to the unified model. The ability to handle both single and multiple notes efficiently is commendable.packages/api/src/@core/utils/types/original/original.crm.ts (10)
161-161: Type definition expanded forOriginalContactInput.The inclusion of
AffinityContactInputinOriginalContactInputis a positive change, enhancing the type's flexibility and integration capabilities with Affinity CRM.
171-171: Type definition expanded forOriginalDealInput.The inclusion of
AffinityDealInputinOriginalDealInputis a positive change, enhancing the type's flexibility and integration capabilities with Affinity CRM.
181-181: Type definition expanded forOriginalCompanyInput.The inclusion of
AffinityCompanyInputinOriginalCompanyInputis a positive change, enhancing the type's flexibility and integration capabilities with Affinity CRM.
199-199: Type definition expanded forOriginalNoteInput.The inclusion of
AffinityNoteInputinOriginalNoteInputis a positive change, enhancing the type's flexibility and integration capabilities with Affinity CRM.
228-228: Type definition expanded forOriginalUserInput.The inclusion of
AffinityUserInputinOriginalUserInputis a positive change, enhancing the type's flexibility and integration capabilities with Affinity CRM.
248-248: Type definition expanded forOriginalContactOutput.The inclusion of
AffinityContactOutputinOriginalContactOutputis a positive change, enhancing the type's flexibility and integration capabilities with Affinity CRM.
258-258: Type definition expanded forOriginalDealOutput.The inclusion of
AffinityDealOutputinOriginalDealOutputis a positive change, enhancing the type's flexibility and integration capabilities with Affinity CRM.
268-268: Type definition expanded forOriginalCompanyOutput.The inclusion of
AffinityCompanyOutputinOriginalCompanyOutputis a positive change, enhancing the type's flexibility and integration capabilities with Affinity CRM.
286-286: Type definition expanded forOriginalNoteOutput.The inclusion of
AffinityNoteOutputinOriginalNoteOutputis a positive change, enhancing the type's flexibility and integration capabilities with Affinity CRM.
315-315: Type definition expanded forOriginalUserOutput.The inclusion of
AffinityUserOutputinOriginalUserOutputis a positive change, enhancing the type's flexibility and integration capabilities with Affinity CRM.packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/types.ts (7)
1-14: Review: InterfaceAffinityContactThe
AffinityContactinterface is well-defined with appropriate types for each property. This interface seems to be designed to represent a contact within the Affinity CRM system comprehensively. It includes not only basic contact details but also relational data such asorganization_idsandopportunity_ids, which are essential for CRM functionalities.
- Correctness: The use of arrays for
emails,organization_ids,opportunity_ids, andcurrent_organization_idsis appropriate given that a contact could be associated with multiple emails and organizations.- Consistency: The interface is consistent internally with its naming conventions and data types.
- Maintainability: The clear separation of concerns and explicit typing enhance maintainability.
16-21: Review: TypeAffinityContactInputThe
AffinityContactInputtype is defined as a subset of theAffinityContactinterface, intended for creating or updating contact records. It correctly uses optional properties where appropriate, such asorganization_ids, allowing flexibility in the data provided during contact creation or update.
- Correctness: The choice of required and optional fields aligns well with typical use cases where not all data might be available initially.
- Maintainability: The use of TypeScript's partial types and optional fields aids in creating flexible and maintainable code.
23-29: Review: InterfaceListEntryThe
ListEntryinterface represents an entry in a list within the Affinity system. It includes essential fields likeid,list_id,creator_id,entity_id, andcreated_at.
- Correctness: The fields chosen are appropriate for tracking the creation and ownership of list entries.
- Maintainability: The interface is straightforward and easy to understand, which will help in maintaining the code.
31-39: Review: InterfaceInteractionDatesThe
InteractionDatesinterface captures various dates related to interactions with a contact. It includes fields for the first and last emails, events, chat messages, and interactions, which are crucial for CRM systems to track engagement history.
- Correctness: The comprehensive coverage of interaction types ensures that the system can accommodate detailed tracking.
- Maintainability: The clear naming and separation of interaction types make this interface easy to extend and maintain.
41-49: Review: InterfaceInteractionsThe
Interactionsinterface aggregates various types of interactions by using theInteractionsTypeinterface for each interaction field. This design pattern ensures consistency in how interaction data is handled across different types.
- Correctness: Using a consistent interface for different interaction types simplifies the handling of diverse interaction data.
- Maintainability: The modular approach to interaction data enhances the clarity and maintainability of the code.
51-54: Review: InterfaceInteractionsTypeThe
InteractionsTypeinterface is succinct and focused, capturing the date of an interaction and the associated person IDs. This minimalistic approach is effective for representing interactions without unnecessary complexity.
- Correctness: The inclusion of
person_idsas an array supports scenarios where multiple contacts might be involved in a single interaction.- Maintainability: The simplicity of the interface aids in understanding and maintaining the code.
56-56: Review: TypeAffinityContactOutputThe
AffinityContactOutputtype uses TypeScript'sPartialutility type to create a flexible output type for Affinity contacts. This allows partial objects to be used effectively in functions that may not need full contact details.
- Correctness: The use of
Partialis appropriate for output types where not all data may be necessary.- Maintainability: This approach provides flexibility in handling API responses or partial data updates.
packages/api/src/crm/note/note.module.ts (1)
1-1: Review: Stylistic ChangeThe addition of a blank line at the beginning of the file is a minor stylistic change. It does not impact the functionality or logic of the module but may enhance readability or adhere to coding style guidelines.
| export type AffinityUserOutput = Partial<AffinityUser>; | ||
| export type AffinityUserInput = null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarification Needed for AffinityUserInput
The AffinityUserInput type is defined as null. This is unusual as input types typically define the shape of data for operations like create or update. If this is intentional, consider adding a comment explaining its usage to avoid confusion.
| export class AffinityUserMapper implements IUserMapper { | ||
|
|
||
| constructor(private mappersRegistry: MappersRegistry, private utils: Utils) { | ||
| this.mappersRegistry.registerService('crm', 'user', 'affinity', this); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| desunify( | ||
| source: UnifiedUserInput, | ||
| customFieldMappings?: { | ||
| slug: string; | ||
| remote_id: string; | ||
| }[], | ||
| ): AffinityUserInput { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| unify( | ||
| source: AffinityUserOutput | AffinityUserOutput[], | ||
| customFieldMappings?: { | ||
| slug: string; | ||
| remote_id: string; | ||
| }[], | ||
| ): UnifiedUserOutput | UnifiedUserOutput[] { | ||
| if (!Array.isArray(source)) { | ||
| return this.mapSingleUserToUnified(source, customFieldMappings); | ||
| } | ||
| // Handling array of AffinityUserOutput | ||
| return source.map((user) => | ||
| this.mapSingleUserToUnified(user, customFieldMappings), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private mapSingleUserToUnified( | ||
| user: AffinityUserOutput, | ||
| customFieldMappings?: { | ||
| slug: string; | ||
| remote_id: string; | ||
| }[], | ||
| ): UnifiedUserOutput { | ||
| const field_mappings: { [key: string]: any } = {}; | ||
| if (customFieldMappings) { | ||
| for (const mapping of customFieldMappings) { | ||
| field_mappings[mapping.slug] = user[mapping.remote_id]; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return { | ||
| remote_id: String(user.user.id), | ||
| name: `${user.user?.firstName} ${user.user?.lastName}`, | ||
| email: user.user?.email, | ||
| field_mappings, | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential improvement in error handling and data validation.
While the mapping logic is generally sound, adding error handling and validation for the input data could enhance robustness, especially considering the integration with an external system like Affinity CRM. This could prevent runtime errors and ensure data integrity.
Consider implementing error checks and validations within the mapping methods to handle cases where input data might be missing or malformed.
| import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common'; | ||
| import { IUserService } from '@crm/user/types'; | ||
| import { CrmObject } from '@crm/@lib/@types'; | ||
| import { AffinityUserOutput } from './types'; | ||
| import axios from 'axios'; | ||
| import { PrismaService } from '@@core/prisma/prisma.service'; | ||
| import { LoggerService } from '@@core/logger/logger.service'; | ||
| import { ActionType, handle3rdPartyServiceError } from '@@core/utils/errors'; | ||
| import { EncryptionService } from '@@core/encryption/encryption.service'; | ||
| import { ApiResponse } from '@@core/utils/types'; | ||
| import { ServiceRegistry } from '../registry.service'; | ||
|
|
||
| @Injectable() | ||
| export class AffinityService implements IUserService { | ||
| constructor( | ||
| private prisma: PrismaService, | ||
| private logger: LoggerService, | ||
| private cryptoService: EncryptionService, | ||
| private registry: ServiceRegistry, | ||
| ) { | ||
| this.logger.setContext( | ||
| CrmObject.user.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name, | ||
| ); | ||
| this.registry.registerService('close', this); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async syncUsers( | ||
| linkedUserId: string, | ||
| custom_properties?: string[], | ||
| ): Promise<ApiResponse<AffinityUserOutput[]>> { | ||
| try { | ||
| const connection = await this.prisma.connections.findFirst({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | ||
| provider_slug: 'close', | ||
| vertical: 'crm', | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const resp = await axios.get( | ||
| `${connection.account_url}/auth/whoami`, | ||
| { | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | ||
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | ||
| connection.access_token, | ||
| )}`, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| this.logger.log(`Synced close users !`); | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| data: resp?.data, | ||
| message: 'Affinity users retrieved', | ||
| statusCode: 200, | ||
| }; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| handle3rdPartyServiceError( | ||
| error, | ||
| this.logger, | ||
| 'Affinity', | ||
| CrmObject.user, | ||
| ActionType.GET, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved new service implementation with a suggestion.
The AffinityService is well-implemented with proper dependency injection and error handling. Consider replacing the string concatenation in line 22 with a template literal to enhance code readability and maintainability.
Apply this diff to address the static analysis hint:
- this.logger.setContext(
- CrmObject.user.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name,
- );
+ this.logger.setContext(`${CrmObject.user.toUpperCase()}:${AffinityService.name}`);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common'; | |
| import { IUserService } from '@crm/user/types'; | |
| import { CrmObject } from '@crm/@lib/@types'; | |
| import { AffinityUserOutput } from './types'; | |
| import axios from 'axios'; | |
| import { PrismaService } from '@@core/prisma/prisma.service'; | |
| import { LoggerService } from '@@core/logger/logger.service'; | |
| import { ActionType, handle3rdPartyServiceError } from '@@core/utils/errors'; | |
| import { EncryptionService } from '@@core/encryption/encryption.service'; | |
| import { ApiResponse } from '@@core/utils/types'; | |
| import { ServiceRegistry } from '../registry.service'; | |
| @Injectable() | |
| export class AffinityService implements IUserService { | |
| constructor( | |
| private prisma: PrismaService, | |
| private logger: LoggerService, | |
| private cryptoService: EncryptionService, | |
| private registry: ServiceRegistry, | |
| ) { | |
| this.logger.setContext( | |
| CrmObject.user.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name, | |
| ); | |
| this.registry.registerService('close', this); | |
| } | |
| async syncUsers( | |
| linkedUserId: string, | |
| custom_properties?: string[], | |
| ): Promise<ApiResponse<AffinityUserOutput[]>> { | |
| try { | |
| const connection = await this.prisma.connections.findFirst({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | |
| provider_slug: 'close', | |
| vertical: 'crm', | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const resp = await axios.get( | |
| `${connection.account_url}/auth/whoami`, | |
| { | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | |
| connection.access_token, | |
| )}`, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| this.logger.log(`Synced close users !`); | |
| return { | |
| data: resp?.data, | |
| message: 'Affinity users retrieved', | |
| statusCode: 200, | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| handle3rdPartyServiceError( | |
| error, | |
| this.logger, | |
| 'Affinity', | |
| CrmObject.user, | |
| ActionType.GET, | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common'; | |
| import { IUserService } from '@crm/user/types'; | |
| import { CrmObject } from '@crm/@lib/@types'; | |
| import { AffinityUserOutput } from './types'; | |
| import axios from 'axios'; | |
| import { PrismaService } from '@@core/prisma/prisma.service'; | |
| import { LoggerService } from '@@core/logger/logger.service'; | |
| import { ActionType, handle3rdPartyServiceError } from '@@core/utils/errors'; | |
| import { EncryptionService } from '@@core/encryption/encryption.service'; | |
| import { ApiResponse } from '@@core/utils/types'; | |
| import { ServiceRegistry } from '../registry.service'; | |
| @Injectable() | |
| export class AffinityService implements IUserService { | |
| constructor( | |
| private prisma: PrismaService, | |
| private logger: LoggerService, | |
| private cryptoService: EncryptionService, | |
| private registry: ServiceRegistry, | |
| ) { | |
| this.logger.setContext(`${CrmObject.user.toUpperCase()}:${AffinityService.name}`); | |
| this.registry.registerService('close', this); | |
| } | |
| async syncUsers( | |
| linkedUserId: string, | |
| custom_properties?: string[], | |
| ): Promise<ApiResponse<AffinityUserOutput[]>> { | |
| try { | |
| const connection = await this.prisma.connections.findFirst({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | |
| provider_slug: 'close', | |
| vertical: 'crm', | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const resp = await axios.get( | |
| `${connection.account_url}/auth/whoami`, | |
| { | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | |
| connection.access_token, | |
| )}`, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| this.logger.log(`Synced close users !`); | |
| return { | |
| data: resp?.data, | |
| message: 'Affinity users retrieved', | |
| statusCode: 200, | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| handle3rdPartyServiceError( | |
| error, | |
| this.logger, | |
| 'Affinity', | |
| CrmObject.user, | |
| ActionType.GET, | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 22-22: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
| this.logger.setContext( | ||
| CrmObject.note.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use template literals for string operations.
Using template literals instead of string concatenation can improve readability and is the preferred style in modern JavaScript/TypeScript.
- CrmObject.note.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name,
+ `${CrmObject.note.toUpperCase()}:${AffinityService.name}`,Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.logger.setContext( | |
| CrmObject.note.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name, | |
| ); | |
| this.logger.setContext( | |
| `${CrmObject.note.toUpperCase()}:${AffinityService.name}`, | |
| ); |
Tools
Biome
[error] 22-22: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
| @Injectable() | ||
| export class AffinityService implements IDealService { | ||
| constructor( | ||
| private prisma: PrismaService, | ||
| private logger: LoggerService, | ||
| private cryptoService: EncryptionService, | ||
| private registry: ServiceRegistry, | ||
| ) { | ||
| this.logger.setContext( | ||
| CrmObject.deal.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name, | ||
| ); | ||
| this.registry.registerService('affinity', this); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use template literals for string concatenation.
The constructor logic is correct and well-structured. However, to improve code readability and align with modern JavaScript practices, consider using template literals instead of string concatenation at line 21.
- CrmObject.deal.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name,
+ `${CrmObject.deal.toUpperCase()}:${AffinityService.name}`,Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Injectable() | |
| export class AffinityService implements IDealService { | |
| constructor( | |
| private prisma: PrismaService, | |
| private logger: LoggerService, | |
| private cryptoService: EncryptionService, | |
| private registry: ServiceRegistry, | |
| ) { | |
| this.logger.setContext( | |
| CrmObject.deal.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name, | |
| ); | |
| this.registry.registerService('affinity', this); | |
| } | |
| @Injectable() | |
| export class AffinityService implements IDealService { | |
| constructor( | |
| private prisma: PrismaService, | |
| private logger: LoggerService, | |
| private cryptoService: EncryptionService, | |
| private registry: ServiceRegistry, | |
| ) { | |
| this.logger.setContext( | |
| `${CrmObject.deal.toUpperCase()}:${AffinityService.name}`, | |
| ); | |
| this.registry.registerService('affinity', this); | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 21-21: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/api/swagger/swagger-spec.yamlis excluded by!**/*.yaml
Files selected for processing (20)
- packages/api/scripts/init.sql (1 hunks)
- packages/api/scripts/seed.sql (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/@core/utils/types/original/original.crm.ts (11 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/company/company.module.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/contact/contact.module.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/deal/deal.module.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/note/note.module.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/note/services/affinity/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/note/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/user/services/affinity/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/user/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/api/src/crm/user/user.module.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/shared/src/connectors/enum.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/shared/src/connectors/index.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (3)
packages/api/src/crm/contact/contact.module.ts (1)
Learnt from: developerdhruv PR: panoratech/Panora#481 File: packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/attio/index.ts:32-38 Timestamp: 2024-06-05T06:18:55.940Z Learning: Focus reviews on the `affinity` folder within the CRM services as per user's request.packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/index.ts (1)
Learnt from: developerdhruv PR: panoratech/Panora#481 File: packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/attio/index.ts:32-38 Timestamp: 2024-06-05T06:18:55.940Z Learning: Focus reviews on the `affinity` folder within the CRM services as per user's request.packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/index.ts (1)
Learnt from: developerdhruv PR: panoratech/Panora#481 File: packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/attio/index.ts:32-38 Timestamp: 2024-06-05T06:18:55.940Z Learning: Focus reviews on the `affinity` folder within the CRM services as per user's request.
Biome
packages/api/src/crm/user/services/affinity/index.ts
[error] 22-22: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 58-58: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/mappers.ts
[error] 87-87: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'opts' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
packages/api/src/crm/note/services/affinity/index.ts
[error] 22-22: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 57-57: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 90-90: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/index.ts
[error] 23-23: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 61-61: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 96-96: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/index.ts
[error] 25-25: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 62-62: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 94-94: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/index.ts
[error] 24-24: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 79-79: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 112-112: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
Additional comments not posted (20)
packages/shared/src/connectors/index.ts (1)
1-1: Approved: Addition of 'affinity' to CRM_PROVIDERS.The addition of 'affinity' to the
CRM_PROVIDERSarray is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives to integrate Affinity CRM.packages/shared/src/connectors/enum.ts (1)
8-8: Approved: Addition of 'AFFINITY' to CrmConnectors enum.The addition of
AFFINITY = 'affinity'to theCrmConnectorsenum is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives to integrate Affinity CRM.packages/api/scripts/seed.sql (1)
4-7: Approved: Addition of 'crm_affinity' column to connector_sets.The addition of the
crm_affinitycolumn to theconnector_setstable is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives to integrate Affinity CRM. However, ensure that the default value of TRUE for all records is intended and aligns with business requirements.packages/api/src/crm/note/note.module.ts (2)
1-2: Verify import paths and definitions.Ensure that the paths for
AffinityNoteMapperandAffinityServiceare correct and that these entities are properly defined and exported from their respective modules.
52-53: Approve the addition of new providers.The addition of
AffinityServiceandAffinityNoteMapperto the providers list is necessary for their availability throughout the module. Ensure there are no conflicts with existing services.packages/api/src/crm/user/user.module.ts (2)
1-2: Verify import paths and definitions.Ensure that the paths for
AffinityUserMapperandAffinityServiceare correct and that these entities are properly defined and exported from their respective modules.
52-53: Approve the addition of new providers.The addition of
AffinityServiceandAffinityUserMapperto the providers list is necessary for their availability throughout the module. Ensure there are no conflicts with existing services.packages/api/src/crm/deal/deal.module.ts (2)
1-2: Verify import paths and definitions.Ensure that the paths for
AffinityDealMapperandAffinityServiceare correct and that these entities are properly defined and exported from their respective modules.
53-54: Approve the addition of new providers.The addition of
AffinityServiceandAffinityDealMapperto the providers list is necessary for their availability throughout the module. Ensure there are no conflicts with existing services.packages/api/src/crm/user/services/affinity/index.ts (1)
1-12: Imports and Initial Setup: ApprovedAll imports are relevant and correctly placed for the functionality of the
AffinityService.packages/api/src/crm/company/company.module.ts (2)
1-2: Review of import statements for new providers.The import statements for
AffinityCompanyMapperandAffinityServiceare correctly placed and follow the project's existing structure. This ensures that the new functionality related to Affinity CRM is properly encapsulated within its service and mapper.
62-63: Addition of new providers to the module.The
AffinityServiceandAffinityCompanyMapperhave been correctly added to the providers array of the module. This is crucial for enabling the new Affinity CRM functionality within the company module. Ensure that these services are properly initialized and that their dependencies, if any, are available in the module.packages/api/src/crm/company/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1)
12-96: Review ofAffinityCompanyMapperimplementation.The
AffinityCompanyMapperclass is well-implemented with clear separation of concerns between thedesunifyandunifymethods. These methods handle the conversion between the unified CRM model and the Affinity-specific model effectively. The use of asynchronous methods and custom field mappings are appropriate for the operations being performed.
- The
desunifymethod correctly handles the transformation of unified model data to the Affinity model, considering custom field mappings.- The
unifymethod efficiently handles both single and multiple company data inputs, which is crucial for operations that may involve bulk data processing.Overall, the implementation is robust and adheres to modern TypeScript practices.
Tools
Biome
[error] 87-87: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'opts' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
packages/api/src/crm/note/services/affinity/index.ts (1)
13-93: Review ofAffinityServiceimplementation.The
AffinityServiceclass is well-implemented, providing methods for adding and syncing notes with Affinity CRM. The use ofaxiosfor HTTP requests and the handling of API responses are appropriate. The service correctly registers itself and sets the logger context, which is crucial for debugging and monitoring.
- The
addNotemethod correctly handles the creation of notes by making a POST request to the Affinity API.- The
syncmethod efficiently retrieves notes using a GET request and handles potential multiple responses withPromise.all.Overall, the implementation is robust, adheres to modern TypeScript practices, and correctly handles API interactions.
Tools
Biome
[error] 22-22: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 57-57: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
[error] 90-90: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
packages/api/src/crm/contact/services/affinity/mappers.ts (1)
18-44: Verify assumptions about data presence and approve data conversion logic.The method correctly converts unified CRM contact input into Affinity-specific format. However, it assumes that 'email_addresses' and 'phone_numbers' arrays contain at least one entry. Consider adding checks to ensure these arrays are not empty to avoid runtime errors.
packages/api/src/crm/deal/services/affinity/index.ts (1)
15-27: Use template literals for string concatenation.The constructor logic is correct and well-structured. However, to improve code readability and align with modern JavaScript practices, consider using template literals instead of string concatenation at line 24.
- CrmObject.deal.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name, + `${CrmObject.deal.toUpperCase()}:${AffinityService.name}`,Tools
Biome
[error] 24-24: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
packages/api/src/@core/utils/types/original/original.crm.ts (2)
157-161: Addition of Affinity CRM types.The imports for Affinity types (
AffinityCompanyInput,AffinityCompanyOutput, etc.) are correctly added and follow the existing pattern of CRM service type imports. This ensures consistency in how CRM types are managed across different services.
167-167: Update to Original CRM Input and Output Types.The addition of Affinity types to the union types for various CRM entities (Contact, Deal, Company, Note, User) is correctly implemented. Each type now includes the corresponding Affinity input or output, which aligns with the PR's objective to integrate Affinity CRM. This change enhances the system's flexibility to handle different CRM data formats and ensures that the new CRM integration can be utilized effectively.
Also applies to: 177-177, 187-187, 205-205, 234-234, 254-254, 264-264, 274-274, 292-292, 321-321
packages/api/scripts/init.sql (1)
555-555: Addition ofcrm_affinitycolumn toconnector_setstable.The addition of the
crm_affinitycolumn as a boolean type that allows NULL values is appropriate for tracking CRM integration states. This column will help in managing the state of Affinity CRM integration across different connector sets. The SQL syntax is correct, and the placement of the column in the table schema is consistent with the existing structure.packages/api/src/crm/contact/contact.module.ts (1)
1-2: Review of Affinity CRM Integration in Contact ModuleThe addition of
AffinityContactMapperandAffinityServiceis correctly implemented. These services are properly imported and added to the module's providers, which is essential for their availability throughout the application.However, it's crucial to ensure that these services are correctly instantiated, especially since they are now part of the module's exports. This integration should be tested to verify that it does not interfere with the existing functionalities of the module.
Please ensure that integration tests cover the instantiation and basic functionality of
AffinityContactMapperandAffinityServiceto prevent any runtime issues.Also applies to: 55-56
| @Injectable() | ||
| export class AffinityService implements IUserService { | ||
| constructor( | ||
| private prisma: PrismaService, | ||
| private logger: LoggerService, | ||
| private cryptoService: EncryptionService, | ||
| private registry: ServiceRegistry, | ||
| ) { | ||
| this.logger.setContext( | ||
| CrmObject.user.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name, | ||
| ); | ||
| this.registry.registerService('affinity', this); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Class Definition and Constructor: Mostly Approved
The class is correctly set up with dependency injection and service registration. However, consider improving the logger context setup:
Replace string concatenation with template literals for better readability and maintainability:
- this.logger.setContext(
- CrmObject.user.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name,
- );
+ this.logger.setContext(`${CrmObject.user.toUpperCase()}:${AffinityService.name}`);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Injectable() | |
| export class AffinityService implements IUserService { | |
| constructor( | |
| private prisma: PrismaService, | |
| private logger: LoggerService, | |
| private cryptoService: EncryptionService, | |
| private registry: ServiceRegistry, | |
| ) { | |
| this.logger.setContext( | |
| CrmObject.user.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name, | |
| ); | |
| this.registry.registerService('affinity', this); | |
| } | |
| @Injectable() | |
| export class AffinityService implements IUserService { | |
| constructor( | |
| private prisma: PrismaService, | |
| private logger: LoggerService, | |
| private cryptoService: EncryptionService, | |
| private registry: ServiceRegistry, | |
| ) { | |
| this.logger.setContext(`${CrmObject.user.toUpperCase()}:${AffinityService.name}`); | |
| this.registry.registerService('affinity', this); | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 22-22: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
| async sync(data: SyncParam): Promise<ApiResponse<AffinityUserOutput[]>> { | ||
| try { | ||
| const { linkedUserId } = data; | ||
|
|
||
| const connection = await this.prisma.connections.findFirst({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | ||
| provider_slug: 'affinity', | ||
| vertical: 'crm', | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const resp = await axios.get( | ||
| `${connection.account_url}/auth/whoami`, | ||
| { | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | ||
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | ||
| connection.access_token, | ||
| )}`, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| this.logger.log(`Synced close users !`); | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| data: resp?.data, | ||
| message: 'Affinity users retrieved', | ||
| statusCode: 200, | ||
| }; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Method sync: Simplify Error Handling
The method's logic for synchronizing user data is sound. However, the catch block that rethrows the error is redundant and can be removed for clarity:
Remove the redundant catch block to simplify the error handling:
- } catch (error) {
- throw error;
- }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async sync(data: SyncParam): Promise<ApiResponse<AffinityUserOutput[]>> { | |
| try { | |
| const { linkedUserId } = data; | |
| const connection = await this.prisma.connections.findFirst({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | |
| provider_slug: 'affinity', | |
| vertical: 'crm', | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const resp = await axios.get( | |
| `${connection.account_url}/auth/whoami`, | |
| { | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | |
| connection.access_token, | |
| )}`, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| this.logger.log(`Synced close users !`); | |
| return { | |
| data: resp?.data, | |
| message: 'Affinity users retrieved', | |
| statusCode: 200, | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| async sync(data: SyncParam): Promise<ApiResponse<AffinityUserOutput[]>> { | |
| const { linkedUserId } = data; | |
| const connection = await this.prisma.connections.findFirst({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | |
| provider_slug: 'affinity', | |
| vertical: 'crm', | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const resp = await axios.get( | |
| `${connection.account_url}/auth/whoami`, | |
| { | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | |
| connection.access_token, | |
| )}`, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| this.logger.log(`Synced close users !`); | |
| return { | |
| data: resp?.data, | |
| message: 'Affinity users retrieved', | |
| statusCode: 200, | |
| }; | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 58-58: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| let opts: any = {}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use const for unmodified variables.
The variable opts is never reassigned and should be declared with const to prevent reassignment and better communicate its intended immutability. This change aligns with best practices for immutability in JavaScript/TypeScript.
- let opts: any = {};
+ const opts: any = {};Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let opts: any = {}; | |
| const opts: any = {}; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 87-87: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'opts' is never reassigned.
Safe fix: Use const instead.
(lint/style/useConst)
| statusCode: 201, | ||
| }; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw error; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant catch clauses.
The catch clauses that only rethrow the original error are redundant and can be removed to simplify the error handling. This will make the code cleaner and easier to maintain.
- } catch (error) {
- throw error;
- }Also applies to: 90-90
Tools
Biome
[error] 57-57: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
| CrmObject.note.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use template literals for string operations.
Using template literals instead of string concatenation can improve readability and is the preferred style in modern JavaScript/TypeScript.
- CrmObject.note.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name,
+ `${CrmObject.note.toUpperCase()}:${AffinityService.name}`,Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| CrmObject.note.toUpperCase() + ':' + AffinityService.name, | |
| ); | |
| `${CrmObject.note.toUpperCase()}:${AffinityService.name}`, | |
| ); |
Tools
Biome
[error] 22-22: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
| async sync(data: SyncParam): Promise<ApiResponse<AffinityDealOutput[]>> { | ||
| try { | ||
| const { linkedUserId } = data; | ||
|
|
||
| const connection = await this.prisma.connections.findFirst({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | ||
| provider_slug: 'affinity', | ||
| vertical: 'crm', | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| const resp = await axios.get( | ||
| `${connection.account_url}/opportunities`, | ||
| { | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | ||
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | ||
| connection.access_token, | ||
| )}`, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| this.logger.log(`Synced affinity deals !`); | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| data: resp?.data?.data, | ||
| message: 'Affinity deals retrieved', | ||
| statusCode: 200, | ||
| }; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize error handling by removing redundant catch clauses.
The method logic for synchronizing deals is well-implemented. However, the catch clause at lines 112-113 is redundant as it only rethrows the error. Consider removing this to simplify the error handling.
- } catch (error) {
- throw error;
- }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async sync(data: SyncParam): Promise<ApiResponse<AffinityDealOutput[]>> { | |
| try { | |
| const { linkedUserId } = data; | |
| const connection = await this.prisma.connections.findFirst({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | |
| provider_slug: 'affinity', | |
| vertical: 'crm', | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const resp = await axios.get( | |
| `${connection.account_url}/opportunities`, | |
| { | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | |
| connection.access_token, | |
| )}`, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| this.logger.log(`Synced affinity deals !`); | |
| return { | |
| data: resp?.data?.data, | |
| message: 'Affinity deals retrieved', | |
| statusCode: 200, | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| async sync(data: SyncParam): Promise<ApiResponse<AffinityDealOutput[]>> { | |
| try { | |
| const { linkedUserId } = data; | |
| const connection = await this.prisma.connections.findFirst({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | |
| provider_slug: 'affinity', | |
| vertical: 'crm', | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const resp = await axios.get( | |
| `${connection.account_url}/opportunities`, | |
| { | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | |
| connection.access_token, | |
| )}`, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| this.logger.log(`Synced affinity deals !`); | |
| return { | |
| data: resp?.data?.data, | |
| message: 'Affinity deals retrieved', | |
| statusCode: 200, | |
| }; | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 112-112: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
| async addDeal( | ||
| dealData: AffinityDealInput, | ||
| linkedUserId: string, | ||
| ): Promise<ApiResponse<AffinityDealOutput>> { | ||
| try { | ||
| const connection = await this.prisma.connections.findFirst({ | ||
| where: { | ||
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | ||
| provider_slug: 'affinity', | ||
| vertical: 'crm', | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const list_resp = await axios.get( | ||
| `${connection.account_url}/lists`, | ||
| { | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | ||
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | ||
| connection.access_token, | ||
| )}`, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| for (const list of list_resp.data) { | ||
| if (list.type === 8) { | ||
| dealData.list_id = list.id; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const resp = await axios.post( | ||
| `${connection.account_url}/opportunities`, | ||
| JSON.stringify(dealData), | ||
| { | ||
| headers: { | ||
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | ||
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | ||
| connection.access_token, | ||
| )}`, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| data: resp?.data, | ||
| message: 'Affinity deal created', | ||
| statusCode: 201, | ||
| }; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize error handling by removing redundant catch clauses.
The method logic for adding a deal is well-implemented. However, the catch clause at lines 78-80 is redundant as it only rethrows the error. Consider removing this to simplify the error handling.
- } catch (error) {
- throw error;
- }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async addDeal( | |
| dealData: AffinityDealInput, | |
| linkedUserId: string, | |
| ): Promise<ApiResponse<AffinityDealOutput>> { | |
| try { | |
| const connection = await this.prisma.connections.findFirst({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | |
| provider_slug: 'affinity', | |
| vertical: 'crm', | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const list_resp = await axios.get( | |
| `${connection.account_url}/lists`, | |
| { | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | |
| connection.access_token, | |
| )}`, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| for (const list of list_resp.data) { | |
| if (list.type === 8) { | |
| dealData.list_id = list.id; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| const resp = await axios.post( | |
| `${connection.account_url}/opportunities`, | |
| JSON.stringify(dealData), | |
| { | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | |
| connection.access_token, | |
| )}`, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| return { | |
| data: resp?.data, | |
| message: 'Affinity deal created', | |
| statusCode: 201, | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw error; | |
| } | |
| async addDeal( | |
| dealData: AffinityDealInput, | |
| linkedUserId: string, | |
| ): Promise<ApiResponse<AffinityDealOutput>> { | |
| try { | |
| const connection = await this.prisma.connections.findFirst({ | |
| where: { | |
| id_linked_user: linkedUserId, | |
| provider_slug: 'affinity', | |
| vertical: 'crm', | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| const list_resp = await axios.get( | |
| `${connection.account_url}/lists`, | |
| { | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | |
| connection.access_token, | |
| )}`, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| for (const list of list_resp.data) { | |
| if (list.type === 8) { | |
| dealData.list_id = list.id; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| const resp = await axios.post( | |
| `${connection.account_url}/opportunities`, | |
| JSON.stringify(dealData), | |
| { | |
| headers: { | |
| 'Content-Type': 'application/json', | |
| Authorization: `Basic ${this.cryptoService.decrypt( | |
| connection.access_token, | |
| )}`, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| return { | |
| data: resp?.data, | |
| message: 'Affinity deal created', | |
| statusCode: 201, | |
| }; | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 79-79: The catch clause that only rethrows the original error is redundant.
These unnecessary catch clauses can be confusing. It is recommended to remove them.
(lint/complexity/noUselessCatch)
| @Injectable() | ||
| export class AffinityUserMapper implements IUserMapper { | ||
| constructor(private mappersRegistry: MappersRegistry, private utils: Utils) { | ||
| this.mappersRegistry.registerService('crm', 'user', 'affinity', this); | ||
| } | ||
| desunify( | ||
| source: UnifiedCrmUserInput, | ||
| customFieldMappings?: { | ||
| slug: string; | ||
| remote_id: string; | ||
| }[], | ||
| ) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| unify( | ||
| source: AffinityUserOutput | AffinityUserOutput[], | ||
| connectionId: string, | ||
| customFieldMappings?: { | ||
| slug: string; | ||
| remote_id: string; | ||
| }[], | ||
| ): Promise<UnifiedCrmUserOutput | UnifiedCrmUserOutput[]> { | ||
| if (!Array.isArray(source)) { | ||
| return this.mapSingleUserToUnified( | ||
| source, | ||
| connectionId, | ||
| customFieldMappings, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| // Handling array of AffinityUserOutput | ||
| return Promise.all( | ||
| source.map((user) => | ||
| this.mapSingleUserToUnified(user, connectionId, customFieldMappings), | ||
| ), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private async mapSingleUserToUnified( | ||
| user: AffinityUserOutput, | ||
| connectionId: string, | ||
| customFieldMappings?: { | ||
| slug: string; | ||
| remote_id: string; | ||
| }[], | ||
| ): Promise<UnifiedCrmUserOutput> { | ||
| const field_mappings: { [key: string]: any } = {}; | ||
| if (customFieldMappings) { | ||
| for (const mapping of customFieldMappings) { | ||
| field_mappings[mapping.slug] = user[mapping.remote_id]; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return { | ||
| remote_id: String(user.user.id), | ||
| name: `${user.user?.firstName} ${user.user?.lastName}`, | ||
| email: user.user?.email, | ||
| field_mappings, | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of Affinity User Mapper Implementation
The AffinityUserMapper class is well-structured and follows good practices with dependency injection and service registration. The methods unify and desunify are implemented with clear logic for handling single and multiple user data transformations.
However, considering the integration with an external system, it is crucial to implement robust error handling and data validation to ensure the integrity and reliability of the data being processed. This will help in preventing runtime errors and maintaining data consistency across systems.
Consider adding error handling and validation within the unify and desunify methods to manage cases where input data might be missing or malformed. This could include checks for required fields and validation of data formats.
+ if (!source) {
+ throw new Error("Source data is required for unification.");
+ }
+ if (!connectionId) {
+ throw new Error("Connection ID is required.");
+ }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const result: AffinityDealInput = { | ||
| name: source.name, | ||
| list_id: 21, | ||
| ...opts | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| if (customFieldMappings && source.field_mappings) { | ||
| for (const [k, v] of Object.entries(source.field_mappings)) { | ||
| const mapping = customFieldMappings.find( | ||
| (mapping) => mapping.slug === k, | ||
| ); | ||
| if (mapping) { | ||
| result[mapping.remote_id] = v; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return result; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async unify( | ||
| source: AffinityDealOutput | AffinityDealOutput[], | ||
| connectionId: string, | ||
| customFieldMappings?: { | ||
| slug: string; | ||
| remote_id: string; | ||
| }[], | ||
| ): Promise<UnifiedCrmDealOutput | UnifiedCrmDealOutput[]> { | ||
| if (!Array.isArray(source)) { | ||
| return await this.mapSingleDealToUnified( | ||
| source, | ||
| connectionId, | ||
| customFieldMappings, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| // Handling array of AffinityDealOutput | ||
| return Promise.all( | ||
| source.map((deal) => | ||
| this.mapSingleDealToUnified(deal, connectionId, customFieldMappings), | ||
| ), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private async mapSingleDealToUnified( | ||
| deal: AffinityDealOutput, | ||
| connectionId: string, | ||
| customFieldMappings?: { | ||
| slug: string; | ||
| remote_id: string; | ||
| }[], | ||
| ): Promise<UnifiedCrmDealOutput> { | ||
| const field_mappings: { [key: string]: any } = {}; | ||
| if (customFieldMappings) { | ||
| for (const mapping of customFieldMappings) { | ||
| field_mappings[mapping.slug] = deal[mapping.remote_id]; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| let opts: any = {} | ||
|
|
||
| if (deal.list_entries) { | ||
| const user_id = await this.utils.getUserUuidFromRemoteId( | ||
| String(deal.list_entries[0].creator_id), | ||
| 'affinity' | ||
| ); | ||
| if (user_id) { | ||
| opts = { | ||
| ...opts, | ||
| user_id | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (deal.organization_ids && deal.organization_ids.length > 0) { | ||
| const company_id = await this.utils.getCompanyUuidFromRemoteId( | ||
| String(deal.organization_ids[0]), | ||
| 'affinity' | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| if (company_id) { | ||
| opts = { | ||
| ...opts, | ||
| company_id | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| remote_id: String(deal.id), | ||
| name: deal.name, | ||
| description: '', // Placeholder if there's no direct mapping | ||
| amount: 0, | ||
| field_mappings, | ||
| ...opts | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of Affinity Deal Mapper Implementation
The AffinityDealMapper class is well-structured and follows good practices with dependency injection and service registration. The methods unify and desunify are implemented with clear logic for handling single and multiple deal data transformations.
Similar to the user mapper, it is crucial to implement robust error handling and data validation to ensure the integrity and reliability of the data being processed. This will help in preventing runtime errors and maintaining data consistency across systems.
Consider adding error handling and validation within the unify and desunify methods to manage cases where input data might be missing or malformed. This could include checks for required fields and validation of data formats.
+ if (!source) {
+ throw new Error("Source data is required for unification.");
+ }
+ if (!connectionId) {
+ throw new Error("Connection ID is required.");
+ }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| connectionId: string, | ||
| customFieldMappings?: { | ||
| slug: string; | ||
| remote_id: string; | ||
| }[], | ||
| ): Promise<UnifiedCrmNoteOutput | UnifiedCrmNoteOutput[]> { | ||
| if (!Array.isArray(source)) { | ||
| return await this.mapSingleNoteToUnified( | ||
| source, | ||
| connectionId, | ||
| customFieldMappings, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return Promise.all( | ||
| source.map((note) => | ||
| this.mapSingleNoteToUnified(note, connectionId, customFieldMappings), | ||
| ), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private async mapSingleNoteToUnified( | ||
| note: AffinityNoteOutput, | ||
| connectionId: string, | ||
| customFieldMappings?: { | ||
| slug: string; | ||
| remote_id: string; | ||
| }[], | ||
| ): Promise<UnifiedCrmNoteOutput> { | ||
| const field_mappings: { [key: string]: any } = {}; | ||
| if (customFieldMappings) { | ||
| for (const mapping of customFieldMappings) { | ||
| field_mappings[mapping.slug] = note[mapping.remote_id]; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| let opts: any = {}; | ||
|
|
||
| if (note.creator_id) { | ||
| const user_id = await this.utils.getUserUuidFromRemoteId( | ||
| String(note.creator_id), | ||
| 'affinity' | ||
| ); | ||
| if (user_id) { | ||
| opts = { | ||
| ...opts, | ||
| user_id | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (note.organization_ids && note.organization_ids.length > 0) { | ||
| const company_id = await this.utils.getCompanyUuidFromRemoteId( | ||
| String(note.organization_ids[0]), | ||
| 'affinity' | ||
| ); | ||
| if (company_id) { | ||
| opts = { | ||
| ...opts, | ||
| company_id | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (note.person_ids && note.person_ids.length > 0) { | ||
| const contact_id = await this.utils.getContactUuidFromRemoteId( | ||
| String(note.person_ids[0]), | ||
| 'affinity' | ||
| ); | ||
| if (contact_id) { | ||
| opts = { | ||
| ...opts, | ||
| contact_id | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (note.opportunity_ids && note.opportunity_ids.length > 0) { | ||
| const deal_id = await this.utils.getDealUuidFromRemoteId( | ||
| String(note.opportunity_ids[0]), | ||
| 'affinity' | ||
| ); | ||
| if (deal_id) { | ||
| opts = { | ||
| ...opts, | ||
| deal_id | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| remote_id: note.id, | ||
| content: note.content, | ||
| field_mappings, | ||
| ...opts, | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of AffinityNoteMapper Class
The AffinityNoteMapper class is well-structured and adheres to the principles of clean code and modularity. Here are some specific observations and suggestions:
-
Dependency Injection and Registration:
- The constructor uses dependency injection for
MappersRegistryandUtils, which is a good practice in NestJS applications. The registration of the service within the constructor ensures that the mapper is available for use immediately after instantiation.
- The constructor uses dependency injection for
-
Method
desunify:- This method converts a unified CRM note format to an Affinity-specific format. The use of async/await is appropriate given the potential delays in network requests to fetch remote IDs.
- The method handles various fields (
user_id,company_id,contact_id,deal_id) which are converted using utility methods. This separation of concerns is good, but the repeated pattern suggests that a refactoring could simplify the code. - Suggestion: Consider creating a helper method to handle the repeated pattern of fetching remote IDs and updating the options object.
-
Method
unify:- Converts from Affinity-specific formats back to a unified format. The handling of both single and multiple notes is a good practice, ensuring flexibility in usage.
- The use of
Promise.allfor handling multiple notes concurrently is efficient and appropriate. - Similar to
desunify, there's a repeated pattern in handling different IDs which could be refactored into a helper method.
-
Error Handling:
- The current implementation does not explicitly handle errors that might occur during the fetching of remote IDs. Given that network requests are involved, adding error handling would make the system more robust.
- Suggestion: Add try-catch blocks around the network requests or ensure that the utility methods themselves handle exceptions gracefully.
-
Performance Considerations:
- The methods make multiple asynchronous calls which are necessary but could be optimized if there are multiple IDs to fetch simultaneously.
- Suggestion: If applicable, modify the utility methods to handle batches of IDs to reduce the number of network requests.
-
Code Documentation:
- The code lacks comments explaining the purpose of the methods and the logic within them. While the code is relatively clear, adding documentation would improve maintainability and ease of understanding for new developers.
- Suggestion: Add method-level and inline comments to improve code documentation.
Overall, the AffinityNoteMapper class is functionally comprehensive and aligns with the objectives of integrating with Affinity CRM. The suggestions provided aim to enhance maintainability, performance, and robustness.
mit-27
had a problem deploying
to
SELF_HOSTED
GitHub Actions
Failure
|
| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9198067 | Triggered | Generic Password | 5a60903 | .env.example | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
mit-27
had a problem deploying
to
SELF_HOSTED
GitHub Actions
Failure
Objects
Third party object Name -> Unified Object
closes #448
/claim #448
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
AffinityServicefor managing company, contact, deal, note, and user data integration with the Affinity CRM system.Enhancements
Affinityvariants for better integration with the Affinity service.crm_affinityto theconnector_setstable for improved CRM integration capabilities.Bug Fixes
Documentation