Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RESTWS-959: Support localization of Concepts via standard "ui.i18n.Co… #633

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mogoodrich
Copy link
Member

@mogoodrich mogoodrich commented Oct 18, 2024

…ncept.name.{uuid}" pattern

Description of what I changed

Issue I worked on

see https://issues.openmrs.org/browse/RESTWS-959

Checklist: I completed these to help reviewers :)

  • My IDE is configured to follow the code style of this project.

    No? Unsure? -> configure your IDE, format the code and add the changes with git add . && git commit --amend

  • I have added tests to cover my changes. (If you refactored
    existing code that was well tested you do not have to add tests)

    No? -> write tests and add them to this commit git add . && git commit --amend

  • I ran mvn clean package right before creating this pull request and
    added all formatting changes to my commit.

    No? -> execute above command

  • All new and existing tests passed.

    No? -> figure out why and add the fix to your commit. It is your responsibility to make sure your code works.

  • My pull request is based on the latest changes of the master branch.

    No? Unsure? -> execute command git pull --rebase upstream master

} else {
return localization;
}
}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needed to pull this up to the superclass since Concept only extends DelegatingCrudResource, not MetadataDelegatingCrudResource for some reason.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 47.712% (-0.01%) from 47.722%
when pulling 97de3c8 on RESTWS-959
into 61a27fa on master.

@ibacher
Copy link
Member

ibacher commented Oct 19, 2024

Could you say more about the use-case here? I’m actually kind of uncertain about how good of an idea it is to add complexity to how concept display names are determined. But maybe this is a feature you’ve already been leveraging?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants