Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reimplemented LogStash::String setting in Java #16576

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andsel
Copy link
Contributor

@andsel andsel commented Oct 17, 2024

Release notes

What does this PR do?

Why is it important/What is the impact to the user?

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files (and/or docker env variables)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

Author's Checklist

  • Implements the other constructors, with 2 and 3 params and spread the use
    • Execute SPEC_OPTS="-fd -f logstash-core/spec/logstash/runner_spec.rb" ./gradlew --rerun-tasks :logstash-core:rubyTests there is a problem in reading the deprecation logger messages in
      expect(deprecation_logger_stub).to receive(:deprecated).with(a_string_including "`http.host` is a deprecated alias for `api.http.host`")
      . Suggestion mock the Appender and reconfigure logs?
  • Check the code for other instantiations of LogStash::String.new
  • Translate RSpec tests to JUnit if there are or cover with some testing
  • Rename StringSetting to String and use explicit java.lang.String around

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Use cases

Screenshots

Logs

@andsel andsel self-assigned this Oct 17, 2024
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

elasticmachine commented Oct 18, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants