Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tests for forceBalance option #140

Open
shaunlebron opened this issue Jul 12, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Add tests for forceBalance option #140

shaunlebron opened this issue Jul 12, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@shaunlebron
Copy link
Collaborator

Each test case has inand out blocks, but I think we need a out-forceBalance block to make sure forceBalance behavior doesn't regress.

Also, I'm not sure why this is currently reproducing bad output (missing close-parens) in 3.0.0:

(def} [1 2 3
++++++
 4 5 6
(def [1 2 3
       4 5 6
@shaunlebron
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I also need to add extra tests for partialResult.

I think I'll hide new out-<option> blocks in <!-- --> comments.

@oakmac
Copy link
Collaborator

oakmac commented Jul 30, 2017

I think I'll hide new out- blocks in <!-- --> comments.

Pushing the limits of the custom annotation syntax.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants