Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow "Blazor Web App" to run in Interactive Render Mode Webassembly in Lambda #1753

Open
2 tasks
genifycom opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
2 tasks
Labels
feature-request A feature should be added or improved. module/aspnetcore-support p2 This is a standard priority issue queued

Comments

@genifycom
Copy link

genifycom commented May 24, 2024

Describe the feature

In .Net 8 if you create a "Blazor Web App" with Interactive Render Mode WebAssembly you will get two projects. The Server side rendered project (SSR) and the client WebAssembly project (CSR).

If you convert this to a Lambda Application, then it runs correctly locally. When deployed to Lambda, the SSR part works correctly (as it is all generated on the server) but the Client Webassembly part does not (CSR).

This is because the Client tries to download the WASM files and runs into an issue.

In Chrome Dev tools -> Network -> WASM

It downloads 27 wasm files correctly but when it gets to dotnet.native.wasm it fails with a 500 error.

This file is in the wwwroot/_framework directory and dotnet.native.wasm is 2.78 MB (2,917,966 bytes) in size.

I supposed it is possible that this WASM file when converted to base64 exceeds what lambda can supply in a payload.

But after this 500 error, the rest of the WASM files do not download so the client web assembly application fails.

This is hugely disappointing since this only allows Blazor Web App SSR to run in lambda which is very limiting.

Use Case

Want the lambda function to use both SSR and CSR pages so that Webassembly can be leveraged from Lambda.

Proposed Solution

Increase the lambda payload to allow Blazor CSR rendering to run correctly.

Other Information

NOTE: This is not using Blazor Server at all. Only Server side rendering and Webassembly rendering. There are no web sockets involved at all.

Acknowledgements

  • I may be able to implement this feature request
  • This feature might incur a breaking change

AWS .NET SDK and/or Package version used

All most recent non-preview version.

Targeted .NET Platform

NET 8

Operating System and version

Windows 11

@genifycom genifycom added feature-request A feature should be added or improved. needs-triage This issue or PR still needs to be triaged. labels May 24, 2024
@genifycom genifycom changed the title Allow "Blazor Web App" to run in both Interactive Render Mode Webassembly Allow "Blazor Web App" to run in Interactive Render Mode Webassembly May 24, 2024
@genifycom genifycom changed the title Allow "Blazor Web App" to run in Interactive Render Mode Webassembly Allow "Blazor Web App" to run in Interactive Render Mode Webassembly in Lambda May 24, 2024
@ashishdhingra ashishdhingra added module/aspnetcore-support needs-review p2 This is a standard priority issue and removed needs-triage This issue or PR still needs to be triaged. needs-review labels May 24, 2024
@bhoradc bhoradc added the queued label May 24, 2024
@genifycom
Copy link
Author

Do you need any further information on this item?

@genifycom
Copy link
Author

This really is a huge problem for us.

Blazor CSR can only be deployed in an S3 bucket which means we do not have the control over it like a Lambda process.
Blazor SSR Interactive is a non-starter because we cannot supply a websocket from the lambda function (and do not want to).
Blazor SSR is limited because we still need client side items for any interactivity.

AWS Lambda has been the most successful deployment strategy and we really do not want to have to give it up!

@genifycom
Copy link
Author

Any further questions?

@genifycom
Copy link
Author

genifycom commented Jul 29, 2024

I have finally been able to publish a Webassembly Dotnet application to Lambda but there are additional issues.

  1. Using the standard {proxy} API Gateway resource, the .wasm files for the Blazor webassembly project all have the wrong SHA-256. I assume because the {proxy} route does not have pass through set correctly?

Here is an example Console log
Failed to find a valid digest in the 'integrity' attribute for resource 'https://xxx.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/Prod/_framework/Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.wasm' with computed SHA-256 integrity 'LoFWSPAifjI8QJ1u07C0q1vuvKxs401ZPgwCc1xQS2Q='. The resource has been blocked.
The correct SHA-256 is '8BH+kQfjYuZWxprOICXJ4+tU0OdJOYDKN7G0S3zYYHI='
I assume because of no passthru, the return .wasm file is byte64 encoded and thus the SHA-256 is wrong? Any help here?

API Gateway does return the correct Content-Type as application/wasm

  1. Probably because of 1, the Dotnet CLR wasm gets a too large message
    https://xxx.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/Prod/_framework/dotnet.native.wasm
    "errorMessage": "Response payload size exceeded maximum allowed payload size (6291556 bytes).",
    "errorType": "Function.ResponseSizeTooLarge"
    This dotnet.native.wasm file is actually 2,663 KB and with passthrough this should not exceed 6291556 bytes

  2. Additional files from Microsoft in the Lambda function such as
    https://xxx.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/Prod/_framework/icudt_EFIGS.dat
    Gets a 404.
    For these .dat files, the Content-Type is application/json but it should be application/octet-stream

Can anyone suggest how to workaround these issue?

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request A feature should be added or improved. module/aspnetcore-support p2 This is a standard priority issue queued
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants