You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I created a map from a single vector layer and added the layer twice two create two different stylings. The intention is to allow the user to activate the style which is more to his/her liking. I then created a dashboard where I allow users to filter the map based on the attribute table. The map should filter both styled layers i.e. the user should be able to filter the map independend on which styling he/she prefers.
Actual Behavior
The map only filters one of the styled layers -> It appears to me that it filters the last (bottom) layer from the layer order in the map. You can confirm this by changing the layer order in the map, synchronize it with the dashboard and then filter again.
Steps to Reproduce the Problem
Upload vector layer
Create map and add layer twice
style the two "virtual" layers differently
create a dashboard
add attribute table of the layer
add map with the layer and create link to the attribute table
Expected Behavior
I created a map from a single vector layer and added the layer twice two create two different stylings. The intention is to allow the user to activate the style which is more to his/her liking. I then created a dashboard where I allow users to filter the map based on the attribute table. The map should filter both styled layers i.e. the user should be able to filter the map independend on which styling he/she prefers.
Actual Behavior
The map only filters one of the styled layers -> It appears to me that it filters the last (bottom) layer from the layer order in the map. You can confirm this by changing the layer order in the map, synchronize it with the dashboard and then filter again.
Steps to Reproduce the Problem
you can try it out on the public demo.
Specifications
see public demo. I guess this is independent from the setup
Note
This might also be indended behaviour, although I do not really see any good reason for this at this point.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: